Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/nowonder/forschung/aprove/satrung/aprove/lpar4/SK90SLASH4.50.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(0, 1, x) -> f₃(x, x, x)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(0, 1, x) -> f₃(x, x, x)

Q is empty.

The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(0, 1, x) -> f₃(x, x, x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(0, 1, x0)

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F₃(0, 1, x) -> F₃(x, x, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(0, 1, x) -> f₃(x, x, x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(0, 1, x0)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F₃(0, 1, x) -> F₃(x, x, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₃(0, 1, x) -> f₃(x, x, x)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f₃(0, 1, x0)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.